From a commenter to the Amy Alkon article at Pajamas Media I referenced below:
Why shouldn’t wimmin be made to remain sexually available?
Men putting endless barriers around females (as their male reproductive strategy for marginalizing other males) is why we have the ambition, greed, political problems(triangulation: immigration, feminism etc) and the pyschological/pathology, chaotic economic and overall ‘growth’/environmental problems we do in western culture.
Islamics and Polynesians and etc indolent cultures are non growth based –ie non enviromentally destructive and non chaotic/ non pathologic– specifically because the males are content…
…given the “sexual availability” of their females.
It is ironic that the west’s sexual revolution’s and “free love” lead to the price of sex going through the roof (thereby exacerbating male competition to generate more for themselves –at other’s expenses– so they can buy some acceptance and fidelity from a creature so en-pedalsteled that she rarely offers any.)...
I find it fascinating that liberals have no problem advocating “redistribution of wealth” but are blind to the real wealth –that biologically underpins and motivates all the other kinds of competition/ wealth aquiring.
Why can't any of our commenters write like that, huh? Lazy en-pedalsteling bastards.
Anyway, remember: there is no sexism. Much like there is no spoon.
(The Plain People of The Blogs): Whoa.