"As I have said before, I suspect that not even homosexual activists today want the gay gene to be found, even if it exists, because of advances in prenatal genetic testing. It is now possible to routinely screen for 3500 genetic defects while a child is still in the womb.
So these activists rationally fear that pre born children who are detected with this gene will be aborted before they even have the chance to be born. After all, if 90% of babies in the womb who are diagnosed with Downs syndrome never draw their first breath, what are the chances that parents disposed to abortion will not exercise the same choice with regard to the gay gene?"
Real slow for the mouthbreathers:
People who support the rights of women to have sovereignty over their own bodies also tend to NOT be total fucking bigots when it comes to gay people. Only Bags of Dicks like Bryan Fischer are horrified by the concept of having a gay child.
Now if he were suggesting that, were a "gay gene" to be found (such a simplistic concept, only really bandied about by anti-science wingnuts with no understanding of genetics), wingnuts might be prone to abort their gay babies, that might make more sense, because, AS WE ALL KNOW, their opposition to abortion has jackshit to do with "unborn babiez," and everything to do with controlling when, where and how women have sex. (1. Whenever the godly Jeebus husband wants it, 2. In the bed with the lights off so the ladies can't see their Jeebus husbands closing their eyes and fantasizing about entire baseball teams, and 3. With as little emphasis on "her needs" or "her desires" as is possible.)
Hope that helps, Bryan.