What a great week in wingnuttery! The Right has spent this week not just overcome by fake vapors over how lots of the people didn't respond politely to the death of someone who hated and defamed them. NOT CIVIL!.
But then WIngnuttia didn't bat an eyelash when it came to defending the right of Rush Limbaugh to yell "slut" a lot at a woman whose repulsive sexual deviancy led her to the hideous perverted act of speaking her mind in public. THIS IS CIVIL, because Rush Limbaugh is DEFENDING WESTERN CIVILZATION AGAINST WHORES.
Michelle Malkin's take is comical; Sandra Fluke is not a "slut," but a "femme-agogue tool" and "moocher." In defense of her thesis that Fluke is not a "slut" Malkin approvingly links to a bizarre screed from another Georgetown student, who, naturally, calls Fluke a "slut." And adds on "skank" and "Welfare Condom Queen." Potty by proxy!
This person also says that Fluke should do what she does and hang out on the weekends having her hair done and watching musical theater with her "gay boyfriends." Lest you think that this is an odd remark coming from someone who is scolding Fluke for disrespecting G-Town's Jesuit values, I'd say you haven't met too many young men who are considering becoming Jesuits.
But it doesn't get any more amusing than this fucknipple:
If we remove “slut” from our discourse, we thereby discard half the reward of chastity, namely the superiority of prestige that the virtuous woman should rightly enjoy in comparison to those who are less virtuous.
And if we can't call young women who use birth control and have sex "sluts," that will lead to Marxist Totalitarianism, in much the same way that the Left has imposed a cruel Dictorship of the Proletariat by calling racists "racists" and homophobes "homophobes." (Not even kidding. Go get a mango for yourself.)
Most entertainingly, Greater Wingnuttia has discovered that Fluke is a TOTAL FRAUD because she is in law school and has political and moral convictions.
For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate.
I feel faint... she is a "women's rights advocate"... who went out in public... and advocated for women's rights! Has this hussy no shame, to deceive us so?
(Who the hell even calls women college students "coeds" anymore? Perhaps the sort of people shocked and dismayed that women college students use contraception? Maybe?)
This one is a real puzzler, an inscrutable pancake, a snorter:
My only question is, how does someone go from being a champion of domestic violence issues to an expert of women’s reproductive health issues?
Those sneaky women's rights advocates.
Fortunately, one of this person's commenters has the answer.
She obviously a proponent of the “all sex is rape” school of thought
Exactly. Which just shows how deep the plot goes. (1) Be a slut who has sexy sex and wants to make Georgetown pay for it. (2) When she does get Georgetown to pay for it, call Georgetown "rapists" and sue, and get big bucks! It's schemes like this that have made so many women's rights activists so incredibly wealthy.
The wingnut sexist mind: feminists are slutty prudes. I guess it makes sense if you yell it loud enough so you can believe it without having to try to actually understand what you're saying.
