A failed California beauty pageant contestant who loves Jesus and fake tits, and disapproves of homosexuals, at some point in her life made a film of herself masturbating, and according to an Internet Gossip Web Site, the existence of this film caused this woman to lose a lawsuit because the people she was suing found it and threatened her with it.
In the ping-pong ball brain of Ann Althouse, the reason the Internet Gossip Web Site reported on this is because Saul Alinsky told them to. Whee! For, as this idiot has it, "The lesson here is that if you have even the slightest tendency toward conservative thinking, you’re an obvious target for personal destruction by the vicious harpies of the left, especially if you’re an attractive woman."
Right. Sounds rather like these women with slight tendencies towards thought do a fine job of personally self destructing, mainly because publicly engaging in "conservative thinking" is an awfully comical thing to do.
Alinsky is a powerful influence on people who are interested in naked people.
Posted by: Substance McGravitas | November 10, 2009 at 07:13 PM
well then, if "personal destruction by the vicious harpies of the left" is a problem for attractive women, you'd think ann would know at least she's safe.
Posted by: mellowjohn | November 10, 2009 at 08:06 PM
Should this bit of Althousery be chocked up to Obama Derangement Syndrome?
Posted by: Monica_A: Aesthete | November 10, 2009 at 09:16 PM
It's not like Carrie Prejean pointed her boobs at teh Clenis, or such as.
Therefore, wimmen-hatin' lefties are to blame!
~
Posted by: ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© | November 10, 2009 at 09:39 PM
No, Ann, conservative hypocrisy - preaching against that which you do - is always a ripe target for liberals, especially when you demonstrate so much of it.
Posted by: daphne | November 10, 2009 at 09:51 PM
Exactly, ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©. She couldn't be projecting any more if she'd complained about sexism while simultaneously calling someone a "vicious harpy."
Wait a minute...
Posted by: Auguste | November 10, 2009 at 10:24 PM
"Sounds rather like these women with slight tendencies towards thought..."
That's a mild way of putting it. I prefer to say that she's "a bear of very little brain"
Posted by: Snarki, child of Loki | November 10, 2009 at 10:38 PM
I went over there to check it out and maybe throw up a little sarcastic comment, but I couldn't take it. She's just an *sshole, and her commenters are just sad losers. It's just not fun.
Posted by: Guest | November 10, 2009 at 11:17 PM
She's just an *sshole, and her commenters are just sad losers.
Some time ago, I commented over at Alicublog regarding something stupid she had written. She showed up in comments to inform me that the late 1960s - early 1970s social milieu had turned her into a shallow prick and that she hadn't matured since.
Her blog and her commenters are the end of a long journey for her.
Posted by: Spokane Moderate | November 11, 2009 at 07:59 AM
Prejean and Palin are ridiculous people, and so are ripe for ridicule; the right wing building them up into something they are not just makes it easier.
Posted by: Davis | November 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM
"Right. Sounds rather like these women with slight tendencies towards thought do a fine job of personally self destructing, mainly because publicly engaging in "conservative thinking" is an awfully comical thing to do."
Or as Prejean and Palin both declared, if you don't have the looks, nobody will want you. So it comes down to either one, beauty or lizard brained.
Posted by: mary b | November 11, 2009 at 12:25 PM
I'm of the opinion that in Palin's and Prejean's case, they've got both beauty (well, a form of it anyway) and lizard brains. Little Anny Althouse just gets the lizard, and gets it damned drunk on box wine any chance she gets.
Posted by: StringonaStick | November 11, 2009 at 01:16 PM
I believe it is spelled boxed whine.
Posted by: fish | November 11, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Oh good Christ, is the Blithering Drunken Idiot still around?
Posted by: dave | November 12, 2009 at 03:00 AM
Well, she's got to be right. You don't think an Internet celebrity gossip site would just release a hot sex tape of a photogenic celebrity without some arm-twisting by political operatives, do you?
Posted by: g | November 12, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Does it matter that sending videos of masturbating children is technically illegal. Carrie Prejean can be prosecuted for kiddie porn and be a registered sex offender. Or is that the left just being vindictive?
Posted by: SideShow Bob | November 12, 2009 at 11:44 AM
...who loves Jesus and fake tits...
Who doesn't?
Posted by: Bitter Scribe | November 12, 2009 at 03:54 PM
That's ridiculous. Everyone knows Republicans don't sue.
Posted by: Pangloss | November 12, 2009 at 06:36 PM