Quality of Steel
Huh.
Merry Christmas [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
from all of us to all of you.
Thank you for being an essential part of all that is successful here at National Review Online. We're grateful for your loyalty and support — and, of course, your clicks!
This morning we have foremost in our thoughts those who are not with us — those who are serving abroad so that we can celebrate in freedom and those who have left us, in our service, in His, through the natural but heart-wrenching cycles of life. For those who serve and for those who are in pain this Christmas, a special prayer. May God be your comfort and your hope.
Merry Christmas. And a bipartisan wish for, yes, "peace on earth."
Yeah, well, fuck you.
The hard, cold, brutal fact is that not a single American man or woman under arms in Iraq ever, ever had to be there to preserve the ability of Americans to "celebrate in freedom." Whatever the fuck that means. You sent good people to die, and a million Iraqi souls are dead, for nothing but the most squalid of purposes.
Peace? Peace without truth?
The National Review has played a thoroughly pernicious role in modern American culture and nobody remotely connected with that den of swinish lying fools deserves anything other than scorn. Fuck you most sincerely in this holiday season, traitors.
Assholes.
No, no holiday truces. Fuck you.
And, of course, God, if he exists, also thinks you're a pack of smarmy little shits.


I think you missed a smallish mild hypocritical angle in your otherwise persuasive analysis .
Posted by: luneylegume | December 26, 2007 at 07:59 AM
word. nothing could be more absurd than the notion that destroying third world countries that were never a threat to us has a goddamn thing to do with "protecting our freedom". but the sheeple it that bullshit up with a spoon.
Posted by: ran | December 26, 2007 at 08:05 AM
...and a hapeeeee new year.
Posted by: Richterscale | December 26, 2007 at 08:52 AM
oh, c'mon. calm down. the Surge© is working!!
yah...you *really* don't wanna know what I'd like to do to KLo et al, given half the chance and a dark alley. fucking dilettantes.
Posted by: anna | December 26, 2007 at 09:30 AM
those who have left us, in our service
Hey, if it's good enough for jesus, it's good enough for anyone.
Nothing spells peace on earth like a little human sacrifice...
Posted by: whiskey girl | December 26, 2007 at 10:14 AM
"And, of course, God, if he exists, also thinks you're a pack of smarmy little shits."
I think the fact that the entire staff of the National Review are not afflicted with boils, leprosy, syphilis, cholera, and mange is pretty solid proof of the noexistance of God.
Posted by: DrDick | December 26, 2007 at 10:41 AM
"bipartisan"? Would that be from the Bugfuck Crazy Evangelical Party and the Old Money Party?
Posted by: Halloween Jack | December 26, 2007 at 10:54 AM
Don't mince words, son. Tell us what you really think...
Posted by: steve simels | December 26, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Let me add my "fuck you" to your "fuck you."
Posted by: markg | December 26, 2007 at 01:42 PM
*applauds*
Posted by: little green | December 26, 2007 at 02:34 PM
those who are serving abroad so that we can celebrate in freedom
Thers, you missed her point.
She's talking about the darkies who left to fight in Iraq and made America safer for bigots.
Posted by: actor212 | December 26, 2007 at 02:56 PM
always nice to have Wolcott join in!
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/blogs/wolcott/2007/12/jonah-goldbergs.html
(see last paragraph)
congrats, Thers!
Posted by: anna | December 26, 2007 at 04:44 PM
Seconding anna's huzzah.
Huzzah!
Posted by: actor212 | December 26, 2007 at 05:03 PM
come on, it's hard out here for a pimp.
Posted by: skippybkroo | December 26, 2007 at 06:50 PM
No, skip, Pimpin' ain't easy.
Posted by: actor212 | December 26, 2007 at 07:35 PM
So war is a natural cycle of life? How fucking convienient for her. Peace on earth my ass you despicable parasite.
Posted by: Colleen | December 26, 2007 at 08:02 PM
those who are serving abroad so that we can celebrate in freedom and those who have left us, in our service, in His, through the natural but heart-wrenching cycles of life.
Can't overlook the conflation of service to America and Jayzus. Because of course you know they're one and the same.
Posted by: low-tech cyclist | December 26, 2007 at 08:08 PM
Y que se vayan todos a chingar a su puta madre...
amen
Posted by: mextremist | December 26, 2007 at 08:44 PM
Who do you think the "His" is in "in His service"? I thought at first it was probably God, but now I wonder if it's Bush.
Posted by: Leonard Pierce | December 26, 2007 at 08:50 PM
So is there anyone on the staff of National Socialist Review who volunteered for duty in Iraq? Any one of their offspring? Any one they have a professional or personal relationship with?
And I'm not talking about their gardeners or housemaids.
Posted by: dave™© | December 26, 2007 at 09:26 PM
Maybe you can add how stupid the military is -- emulating your recent failed presidential candidate -- given that a clear majority votes with the GOP against the party of hallucinations and weakness.
Posted by: Grayhat | December 26, 2007 at 11:54 PM
I think the fact that the entire staff of the National Review are not afflicted with boils, leprosy, syphilis, cholera, and mange is pretty solid proof of the noexistance of God.
Posted by: DrDick | December 26, 2007 at 10:41 AM
Are you perfectly sure they're not?
Fine. No God. Whatever. I'm sure next you're going to tell me there is no Santa.
Posted by: slag | December 27, 2007 at 12:19 AM
given that a clear majority votes with the GOP against the party of hallucinations and weakness
Hey Greyhat, I got 10 buck that says GOP will not receive a clear majority of military votes in November. You up for it?
Posted by: Twisted_Colour | December 27, 2007 at 01:57 AM
Maybe you can add how stupid the military is -- emulating your recent failed presidential candidate -- given that a clear majority votes with the GOP against the party of hallucinations and weakness.
Would that cheer you?
Fine, then. The opinions of individual members of the military notwithstanding, the US military presence in Iraq is irrelevant to the defense of American liberty.
Feel better?
Posted by: Thers | December 27, 2007 at 02:19 AM
Uh, actually a majority of military families are fed up with Bush and his failed invasion(s).
Posted by: HairlessMonkeyDK | December 27, 2007 at 04:48 AM