World of Fun for You!
Ah, Ann Althouse. Always a delight.
She writes a bit of nonsense about the Pelosi/plane nonsense, gets called on it by Scott at LGM, and then gets herself into a snit because Scott was mean to her by making a perfectly legitimate criticism. Through her mad research skillz, Althouse reveals to a stunned world the shocking news that he isn't a lawyer at all but a political science professor! (A fact he has clearly been at pains to conceal. Bust-ed!)
All of this is of course delivered in her inimitable style. (Well, actually it is irresistibly imitable. More on that later.)
Scott Lemieux -- who has a bizarre case of Althouse Derangement Syndrome -- links to this post and rants obtusely about how it's a post-9/11 security requirement that the Speaker of the House fly in a military plane as opposed to a commercial plane. But this post is about a controversy over the size of the military plane she should have, not about whether or not she should have a military plane. He points out that Hastert got a military plane. Well, duh, Scott, that's in the article I linked to....
And then read the text of my post, which doesn't criticize Pelosi for wanting a military plane by for "her desire to avoid having her plane stop to refuel." You know, words have meaning. Two words you might want to learn are "never" and "mind." And then maybe "I'm" and "sorry." You twit.
Lemieux['s blog] had to withdraw a rant about me on Thursday because his own commenters explained how he was being an idiot and got it wrong. Let's see if he figures out his boo-boo this time and corrects it. I don't normally link to my haters, but I'm going to make an exception just to say that Scott's bumbling is especially ridiculous.
Scott replies in the Althouse comments:
Um, when you're engaging in accusations about "bad readings" it would probably be useful to check and see who wrote the withdrawn post in question... 2:16 PM
- Which prompts this reply from Althouse:
Well, Scott, I see a tiny little image that looks like this: d. I was under the impression that that was a picture of a tiny little prick, and I thought it was you. I'll take your word for it that I was wrong and that despite your loathsomeness, you've managed to find other little pricks who are willing to associate with you. I have corrected my post to indicate that it was not you. Now, have you corrected your vicious stupidity, you pathetic little man? 3:48 PM
- Yikes!
A few observations:
1. Attacking someone's "reading skills" is a bad move when you misidentify the authorship of a post you'd like to single out for attack purposes.
2. It's also poor strategy when your interpretation of events is at odds with information in the very newspaper story you cite as evidence for your claims about the Speaker of the House. To wit, Althouse says: "Can someone explain how Nancy Pelosi has the nerve to tell a group of veterans that her desire to avoid having her plane stop to refuel is all about security?"
Though the LA TImes article she links to contains this paragraph:
The House sergeant at arms originally advised Pelosi that Hastert had used a military plane and recommended that she use one that didn't need to refuel. That prompted her office to request clarification of the rules, Daly said, noting that she never actually requested a specific plane.
How selfish of her to follow someone else's recommendation. (And of course this was available on February 8...)
And what the hell would be so unreasonable about wanting to fly nonstop from DC to California anyway? Mysteries, mysteries...
3. Is Althouse really claiming that she was confused because she confused the the letter "d" first with "Scott Lemieux," and then with a penis? I assume this is intended as some class of "Joke," but it is, um, really fairly bizarre. Althouse owes an apology not only to the letter "d" but perhaps to other consonants as well.
4. That last comment of hers I quoted makes her claim that it is other people who are "deranged" seem somewhat unpersuasive. Somehow.
Anyway. I myself am shocked at Althouse's language. Incivility is the plague of the blogosphere. When oh when will it end.
I will make a start. I here offer a short video that will perhaps clear up the difficulties certain bloggers are having with the letter "d." I hope that with this gesture the Healing May Begin.


Damn, Thers. You write so well. I'd gladly chew off my left arm.
And, of course, she's an idiot.
Posted by: hecate Demetersdatter, Runnymeade Conspirator | February 10, 2007 at 06:06 PM
ALTHOUSE IS A BIG MEANIE.
And she's not very nice, neither.
Posted by: GWPDA | February 10, 2007 at 06:10 PM
Christ, what a blithering fucking idiot.
Posted by: dave | February 10, 2007 at 06:24 PM
So she gets it wrong and continues to bluster in order to distract everyone from her errors?
What is this, a disease? It certainly seems to be contagious. And rampant.
Did she not get the memo that even Bush has declared this a non-story?
Posted by: Rmj, Curiously Refreshing | February 10, 2007 at 06:36 PM
Someone should go back two years and do a "Best of Althouse blogfights."
I don't think I've seen someone own-goal so consistently as she does.
Posted by: Bas-O-Matic | February 10, 2007 at 06:37 PM
BTW, I get a kick out of just what she thinks "withdrawing a post about me" is:
...upon further reflection, Althouse's post wasn't nearly as bad as it could have been.
Wow, talk about decisive victories! d is so pwned!!!11111one!
Advantage: Blithering Idiot!
Posted by: dave | February 10, 2007 at 06:47 PM
Someone should go back two years and do a "Best of Althouse blogfights."
I don't think I've seen someone own-goal so consistently as she does.
She really enjoys the taste of her own foot, doesn't she?
Posted by: Phoenix Woman | February 10, 2007 at 06:48 PM
just thank the invisible cloud dude she's not out there practicing law.
Posted by: 1watt | February 10, 2007 at 06:52 PM
Except that the video is actually a metaphorical presentation of the sperm penetrating the egg, which of course means it had to come from a prick, tiny or not.
Posted by: ignoreland | February 10, 2007 at 06:59 PM
You know what would be really fun if I had the resources?
Invite Ms Althouse to speak at some function out here on the West coast. Then, in booking her flight out here make sure that it is a not a non-stop flight.
It would be pretty damned funny to hear her bitch about it... you know she would.
Posted by: Simp | February 10, 2007 at 06:59 PM
yeah, but what does Altmouse say?
Posted by: geoduck2 | February 10, 2007 at 07:01 PM
I honestly believe it would be a big public service if Althouse could detail all the substances she's abusing and what we need to do to avoid them. At a guess, I'd say crack, carpet fibers, and the stuff that turns toilet bowls blue; but I'm sure it can't be that simple. And is it the specific combinations she's using, or can any of this stuff blow our minds?
I mean, what does the veteran's group have to do with refueling and security? Do vets normally think it's safer to refuel often than to fly non-stop? Or is this just part of the conservative belief that veterans are somehow super-citizens with rights and abilities beyond our own; and that liberals are never allowed to speak directly to them unless accompanied by an approving conservative?
My biggest problem with Althouse isn't that she's a nutjob. It's that she makes parody much too difficult. If I wrote half the stuff she did, it wouldn't be funny and everyone would accuse me of being over the top. Yet she continues to plow-away, completely oblivious to the damage she's doing to an entire branch of comedy. And that's the real shame.
Posted by: Doctor Biobrain | February 10, 2007 at 07:01 PM
You made up this Althouse person--right?
Posted by: BroD | February 10, 2007 at 07:10 PM
For our Republicant friends who are so concerned with costs; reserving a landing slot, refueling, ground crews, inspections, and departure slots all cost money.
But apparently spending the extra money is a non-issue so long as the Republicants can extract the requisite inconvenience from anyone with a 'D' next to their name.
Posted by: eightnine2718281828mu5 | February 10, 2007 at 07:25 PM
Did you forget to post the part where she says "never" and "mind" and "I'm" and "sorry"? Or did she forget her own advice to Scott?
As for "d", it is one of those letters that separate "twit" and "twat".
Annie-boo, stop trying to straddle that line. Impaling yourself on a little "d" prick may be a cheap thrill, but eventually you're going to hurt yourself.
Posted by: jussumbody | February 10, 2007 at 07:37 PM
Well, Scott, I see a tiny little image that looks like this: d. I was under the impression that that was a picture of a tiny little prick, and I thought it was you.
?
and furthermore, ??
and lastly, ???
Posted by: sdf (Stu) | February 10, 2007 at 07:37 PM
More Sesame Street Subversion?
You evil bastard!
Posted by: owlbear1 | February 10, 2007 at 07:44 PM
I had no idea that "d" meant that about my member. I will never use the letter again.
To reiterate:
I ha no i ea that " " meant that about my member. I will never use the letter again.
Posted by: destor23 | February 10, 2007 at 07:56 PM
Poli sci prof or no, Scott still has a better handle on legal issues than does the amazing Ann. And I say that as a Real Live Lawyer.
Posted by: nolo | February 10, 2007 at 07:59 PM
Oooh. Maddie liked that video.
Posted by: four legs good | February 10, 2007 at 08:24 PM
it's a shame there isn't aderenaline-alyzer she could use to disable her computer when she has had too much coffee and is in full tizzy.
Oh, no, wait. That's not a shame at all.
Posted by: mdhatter | February 10, 2007 at 08:41 PM
You know what's the best part about Republicans being out of power in Congress? The entire right wing loony bin is back to doing exactly what they do best.
Impotent, endless bitching and whining about events of no significance. Fiddling while Baghdad burns. Screwing over everyone in America who works for a living while accusing everyone else of elitism every stupid, factually-incorrect, and entirely fabricated chance they get.
Whine. Lie. Steal. Fucking crybabies.
Posted by: JT | February 10, 2007 at 08:46 PM
Well, Scott, I see a tiny little image that looks like this: d. I was under the impression that that was a picture of a tiny little prick, and I thought it was you. I'll take your word for it that I was wrong and that despite your loathsomeness, you've managed to find other little pricks who are willing to associate with you.
Does the University of Wisconsin know their law professors talk like this?
Posted by: The Kenosha Kid | February 10, 2007 at 08:49 PM
I thought Althouse was a parody of Altmouse (life would make more sense if it were).
Posted by: Prior Aelred | February 10, 2007 at 08:53 PM
Stupid and ugly is no way go through life Ann. You can't fix the ugly, at least try harder on the stupid.
Posted by: ice weasel | February 10, 2007 at 09:03 PM
In fairness, you have to be deranged to think that Nancy Pelosi isn't a latte-sipping elitist who hates the troops. Get that Denny Hastert back in there, now there was someone who used a private jet the little guy could identify with!
Posted by: Scott Lemieux | February 10, 2007 at 09:04 PM
I'm delighted we've discovered the determinant of the addled Althouse's delerium: her denken dexterity is undermined by desire when she detects tiny dddd little dddd pricks. Perhaps we should call them objets petit d.
Posted by: VA | February 10, 2007 at 09:05 PM
Hell hath no fury like a right wing blogger-woman ridiculed. Or something.
Posted by: markg | February 10, 2007 at 09:08 PM
strap her down, prop open the eyelids and pipe in the Zevon
Posted by: Nancy Willing | February 10, 2007 at 09:09 PM
Oh the Best of Blogfights! That would be a fun series: We could play Star Trek Fight music in the Background!
We could do a live read on a podcast!
Wheeee!
Posted by: spocko | February 10, 2007 at 09:21 PM
Just in case anyone asks, Thers, the House Sergeant at Arms, Bill Livingood was appointed in January 1995 (so saith Wikipedia).
In other words, by Gingrich.
Posted by: Charles | February 10, 2007 at 09:28 PM
JT @ 8:46: "The entire right wing loony bin is back to doing exactly what they do best: Impotent, endless bitching and whining about events of no significance. " -- and how, exactly, is that any different from what they were busy doing while the inmates were in charge of the asylum?
Posted by: thingwarbler | February 10, 2007 at 09:41 PM
The new drunk drivers have hoisted the flag. We are with you in your anger.
Posted by: Mithras | February 10, 2007 at 09:53 PM
I don't think these people, like Ms. Althouse, are idiots or dummies. They're evil and unprincipled, and being bankrolled by the same people who installed Bush and Cheney, and who run Bush and Cheney and Lieberman, O'Reilly, David Brooks, Barone, all of them. The first name of each of them is Armstrong. Armstrong Limbaugh, Armstrong L.Simon, Armstrong Miller, Armstrong Hinderaker, Armstrong Coulter. Not liars, evil flunkies.
Posted by: thevandle | February 10, 2007 at 10:02 PM
I tried to read Althouse for a while, but she is *really* tiresome. I don't see how people can read her at all.
Posted by: LeisureGuy | February 10, 2007 at 10:35 PM
I tried to read Althouse for a while, but she is *really* tiresome. I don't see how people can read her at all.
Posted by: LeisureGuy | February 10, 2007 at 10:35 PM
OT:
Not to be bitter or anything, but I noticed that even Ntodd has been blog rolled by Thers!
Obviously I didn't offer enough quatloos.
Posted by: spocko | February 10, 2007 at 10:43 PM
Look, I hate to pick on another discipline's credentialing mechanisms and all, but when I read Althouse or Reynolds or Powerline I'm inclined to believe that you can get a law degree in this country by mailing $50,000 and two proof-of-purchase seals from packages of Froot Loops to General Diploma Mills, Battle Creek, Michigan.
Posted by: Michael Bérubé | February 10, 2007 at 10:59 PM
don't think these people, like Ms. Althouse, are idiots or dummies. They're evil and unprincipled, and being bankrolled by the same people who installed Bush and Cheney, and who run Bush and Cheney and Lieberman, O'Reilly, David Brooks, Barone, all of them. The first name of each of them is Armstrong. Armstrong Limbaugh, Armstrong L.Simon, Armstrong Miller, Armstrong Hinderaker, Armstrong Coulter. Not liars, evil flunkies.
*
I sadly concur with this.
Posted by: Nancy Willing | February 10, 2007 at 11:06 PM
Good grief. Althouse has lost it.
Posted by: Dr. Wu | February 11, 2007 at 02:45 AM
50,000 dollar and some fruit loops box tops is clearly putting it too high. I think those law degrees are coming in well under a SSAE and the senders promise to keep buying the fruit loops.
aimai
Posted by: aimai | February 11, 2007 at 06:55 AM
I'd also guess that Ms Althouse owes an apology to that guy she once dated who suffers from having a penis shaped like a d and really didn't want the whole blogsphere to know.
My penis is, in fact, exactly the size and shape of the following full size photograph
d
However, I vehemently deny that Ms Althouse has any way of knowing this (or will ever observe said organ except in this photograph on the web
d.jpg
Posted by: Robert Waldmann | February 11, 2007 at 08:37 AM
The key to understanding Althouse is that she despises men. Take a look at this sketch she made. Actually take a look at her entire Flickr site to see a bunch of her other pathologies.
Her groupies are a very slow bunch. She leaves lots of clues around.
Posted by: Eli Rabett | February 11, 2007 at 10:48 AM
Althouse owes an apology not only to the letter "d" but perhaps to other consonants as well.
That gets amusing quote of the day.
It's easy to see why she couldn't make it as a practicing trial attorney.
Posted by: Libby Spencer | February 11, 2007 at 11:25 AM
The key to understanding Althouse is that she despises men. Take a look at this sketch she made. Actually take a look at her entire Flickr site to see a bunch of her other pathologies.
Eli, she doesn't reserve her hate for men. She hates everyone. It wasn't that long ago she was ripping on a blogger for having breasts! That were noticeable in a photograph!
Actually, I look forward to the day she can be mocked for noticing! that men have bulges! in their jeans!
Posted by: Deanna | February 11, 2007 at 01:19 PM
I'm truly honored by this video. My
micropenisscreen name has never been quite so famous.Posted by: d | February 11, 2007 at 02:00 PM
Gosh, I think disparaging somebody's appearance is pretty low. How'd she know the size of his sexual equipment? Is she that experienced to believe bigger is better? I'm reminded of a comment made under the influence of ouzo whispered in my ear by a semi-famous female musician:
"A woman's mouth is the same size as her vagina." Anne, is that you?
Posted by: mr.ed | February 11, 2007 at 02:39 PM
I think we on the left ought to reconsider this. I mean, after all, Pelosi is second in line behind Cheney, and we have learned very clearly the last couple of weeks how much he rides his Scooter.
Posted by: RichardS | February 11, 2007 at 05:39 PM
Go easy on poor Ann. It must be hard waiting, waiting, waiting for Regnery Press or some news syndicate to come calling with a nice fat contract in hand, especially when she sees those other two gorgons, Coulter and Malkin, pulling in the dough. Don't be impatient, Ann, there's plenty of room for another political whore in the conservative brothel!
Posted by: Figaro | February 12, 2007 at 09:32 AM
i know it may ceem partisan and uncivil of me, but I can only conclude that i have yet to enounter a box of rocks that acheives Althouse levels of stupid
Posted by: The Crapture | February 12, 2007 at 12:41 PM