Can't Hear the Revolution (Thank Christ)
David Broder pens another moving column on the subject of the Unity Party. The Unity Party is a project put together by Wise Men who are fed up with Partisan Bickering. The trouble with politics, they argue, is that people disagree. Their brilliant solution to this problem is to agree on everything, thus ending all disagreement. Shazam! It is truly a wonder that nobody has ever thought of this before.
Astoundingly, the oppressed masses, cowering as they are under the cruel lash of partisanship, are not exactly flocking to the Unity Party banner. The column is actually pretty funny on this point:
I contacted Bailey recently to ask what had happened to this bold gamble, and he was the source of that 35,000 figure for the number of people who have lent support to the scheme. They obviously have a long way to go before they can claim to be a viable political force, but they are making slow, steady progress.
When I called Bailey, it had been just a week since the group announced that anyone who was interested could sign up at http:/
/ www.unity08.com as a voting delegate to a national convention planned for June 2008. Most of the sign-ups came before that formal start, Bailey said, in response to last year's publicity about the formation of Unity08.
So they're not making "slow, steady progress." They got an initial rush and now nobody cares. Jeez, I bet a smart young advertising professional could get more than 35,000 people to sign an online petition for "Federline '08." Or "Aphids '08." Or the "Dysentery Ticket." Or the "Nigerian Inheritance Party."
But there is still a Hunger for Nonpartisanship: the veteran political insider Broder smells it, like a Lab puppy scents a dropped breaded porkchop.
"The need [for a third party] is as great as it's ever been," Bailey said. "The partisan bickering in Washington continues nonstop, and the contest for the nominations in both parties is likely to make it worse."
Egads. Yes, elections do have a disturbing tendency to make people not agree on certain key issues, like who exactly to vote for. But Broder offers a Helpful Suggestion (and this is where we really see Teh Comedy, kids):
I suggested to Bailey that the underlying premise of this campaign -- the need to cure the partisanship of Washington -- might be undercut if the Republicans and Democrats nominated people who are not closely associated with those partisan battles -- mentioning Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee on the GOP side and Barack Obama and Bill Richardson among the Democrats.
No, he really wrote that, and I didn't make it up. Rudy Giuliani, Compromiser. Right.
It just annoys Broder no end that people actually have principles, doesn't it? And that they think these principles are worth fighting for?
Broder is like the Edith Bunker of politics: everybody get along and be happy! Or I'll get crazy! Eeeeek! Ignore the yelling! Except Edith was smarter, and nicer.
Anyway: Stifle, Broder.


On this topic, he makes Andy Rooney look like a model of unpredictable wisdom.
Posted by: pseudonymous in nc | February 26, 2007 at 04:39 AM
If everyone just got along, he wouldn't have to do any of that journalism stuff all the kids seem so mad for these days. I mean, cut the guy some slack. He's tired. His feet hurt.
Posted by: dan mcenroe | February 26, 2007 at 09:43 AM
Mr. Deardourff and Douglas L. Bailey -- operating as Bailey, Deardourff and Associates -- were among the first national political consultants. They specialized in working for moderate and progressive Republican candidates. They worked as do-it-all consultants on more than 70 primary and general election campaigns, providing detailed schedules, cash-flow charts, strategies and tactics.
Bailey didn't leave the REpublican Party, the Republican Party left him. The reason we should care what an unemployed GOP consultant thinks is what, exactly?
Posted by: mrs. ibrahim al-jafaari | February 26, 2007 at 09:59 AM
Will this work?
No.
This has been another edition of simple answers to blahbidy-blah whatever. Bunch of trools. Imagine a whole party of "yes-men."
Oh, wait... Lieberman's about to speak on the news!
Posted by: shrimplate | February 26, 2007 at 10:39 AM
"The trouble with politics, they argue, is that people disagree. Their brilliant solution to this problem is to agree on everything, thus ending all disagreement."
This reminds me of one of my favorite scenes in Star Wars: Attack of the Clones.
Anakin: "Well then they should be made to agree."
Padme: "By whom, who's going to make them agree? You?"
Anakin: "Of course not me. But someone... Someone wise, and strong."
Padme: "Sounds an awful lot like a dictatorship to me."
Anakin: "Well, if it works..."
Posted by: Steve | February 26, 2007 at 11:25 AM
Aphids '08? Include me out!
Posted by: Lamb Cannon | February 26, 2007 at 11:37 AM
I remember reading once that politics is "the art of the possible."
Broder makes it into "low comedy of the oblivious."
Posted by: Genore | February 26, 2007 at 11:44 AM
Edith was totally smart.
Posted by: bobbo | February 26, 2007 at 12:38 PM
So... his solution to partisanship is to add more parties?
Posted by: Skemono | February 26, 2007 at 12:57 PM
Yeah, in honor of Broder I just today added a bunch of "vituperative foul-mouthed blogger of the left" stuff to my cafepress store. And I posted the panties for Mrs. Broder.
Civility that, Wapo.
Posted by: Blue Gal | February 26, 2007 at 02:08 PM
I swear that Unity 08 is just a bunch of republicans who are too ashamed to admit it.
Jesus, I swear Broder would support genocide as long as it had bi-partisan consensus.
Posted by: Fledermaus | February 26, 2007 at 02:46 PM
Jesus, I swear Broder would support genocide as long as it had bi-partisan consensus.
That almost made me spill my coffee on my keyboard.
Posted by: mrjauk | February 26, 2007 at 03:19 PM
What Broder, being an insider, doesn't understand is that the nature of the partisan rancor in DC can best be described as the "fetishism of small differences." The DLC insiders, the Rethuglican careerists, and the Beltway pundits agree on much more than they disagree. The electoral imperative necessitates DC politicians trying to distinguish themselves from someone who, for the most part, has very similar ideals and, more importantly, interests .
The rest (99%) of the population is fundamentally different from the gasbags that control the political and economic life of this country. That the Internet is finally giving the vast silent majority a voice is scaring the bejeesus out of Broder and his ilk.
Posted by: mrjauk | February 26, 2007 at 03:25 PM
Huckabee - ick! And he thinks a Southern Baptist minister would not be divisive? Broder & Co are completely brain dead.
Posted by: CParis | February 26, 2007 at 03:54 PM
mrjauk, you nailed it.
Posted by: jim | February 26, 2007 at 04:18 PM
Some strange cat named Tom is trying to draft my ass to run and I would through my own cap into the ring if I were not shiftless and lazy and crazy.
Plus I might have to see if I remembered the password to log into my blog, which would lead to the clearing of piles upon piles of tumble weeds, and the possibility of constructing a document more than a couple of paragraphs in length, and of course this would resemble something like work, which is my arch enemy (just keepin' it real).
Anyhoo consider this part of an exploratory announcement, a testing of the waters of support as it were.
I can loose the Provider bit if it doesn't Focus test well......howzaboutit can we get more than 35,000???
;)
.
Posted by: ProviderUNE_ITY 08 | February 26, 2007 at 08:55 PM
It should also be clear that I will need an editor and some interns, and some girl scout cookies.......
Posted by: ProviderUNE_ITY 08 | February 26, 2007 at 08:57 PM
No offense, Whiskey Fire, but your "principles" (read: self-righteousness) doesn't hold a flame to the integrity of someone like David Broder. The mistake of liberals like Broder is that they listen to folks like you who are sure they are right about everything too much, not too little.
Posted by: Ben | February 26, 2007 at 09:47 PM
Wow... thanks Ben. That's deep.
Posted by: Thers | February 26, 2007 at 10:16 PM
ProviderUNE for Preznit!
Posted by: Thers | February 26, 2007 at 10:17 PM
ProviderUNE for Preznit!
Hey, he's cuter and can ride a bike better than the current one....
Posted by: Molly Ivors | February 27, 2007 at 08:26 AM
Broder is NOT Edith. Not by a longshot. To wit: "In working out the character of Edith," Lear recalls, "we would answer [the question], 'What did we think Christ would do? That's what she would do'.
http://www.normanlear.com/spirit_4.html
Posted by: IncandenzaH | February 27, 2007 at 06:02 PM
Count me in on Teh UNE Ity '08 Party.
I'm not a dirty fucking hippy, feminist (or any other sort of) blogger, so you could safely hire me, UNE. I mean, I'm a DFH, and a feminist, I just don't have a blog.
Oh, wait, I'm an atheist. So, maybe not. I could pretend to be Catholic, I've got a cousin who's a nun and a nephew who's studying to be a priest. Would that help?
Sorta OT: I met Jean Stapleton once in Washington, DC (she was appearing in some piece of crap at The Kennedy Center). She was very gracious, quite intelligent, and tres chic.
Posted by: Gentlewoman | February 27, 2007 at 06:31 PM
Cool with support like this we can go a long way of moving beyond the craven partisanship of the past and move toward a better more unifying vision of a glorious future.
First we get the funding that FLG needs for the Sun Rockets™. Next we need ducks and lots of 'em (maybe Molly and Thers can help), and a Backhoe!
And Gentlewoman, (nice to see you out and about on the internets, you should drop into the crack den™ more often) you are most welcome to join Team UNE_ITY_08™.
I am deeply humbled by your support.
So with Tom Legg, we got the support of at least 5 adults and 132 children (hope the count is accurate).
/might be time to start another blog.
I'll take suggestions on design elementals.....
:)
Posted by: ProviderUNE_ITY_08 | February 27, 2007 at 08:15 PM
I'll take suggestions on design elementals.....
Lots of Prince Pickles related material!
Posted by: Thers | February 27, 2007 at 10:40 PM
If they wanted to bring people together who would agree to agree no matter what, they really should have called it the Key Party.
Posted by: va | February 28, 2007 at 12:31 AM
One day, I would like to look my friend in a local hospital. I’m not alone, but with my friends, many friends. So because of our noise disturb the medical patient, the security wish us silent.
While we are sitting down in the park, a friend ask us he tell why the nurses, their uniforms is different each other and different in work hours. So how many uniform they have? Another friend then stands up and said, if they have many different uniforms, it means they spent much money to buy it. That’s why their have high salary. I cut the speaking automatically then said, they buy the uniforms in big scale. I ever heard that they buy it through internet. The prices are very competitive but the online store is lower.
To improve my statement, a friend comes to a nurse and ask her that where they buy the uniform. In a moment, a nurse was surprised but later she answered that she didn’t know exactly but she also heard that their management buy from the online store, is that name. The store is leading on the medical uniform supplied, the nurse said. She continues their uniform design is great I am being cute by this uniform. My friends also fell like me. Our doctors also like the uniform because of simple, soft and air circulation.
When we back home, I browse in internet, to find where the Cheap Scrubs. The nurse is right. I have to see before believe. http://www.squidoo.com/cheap_scrubss The store sell medical product, especially uniforms. The first time I have to find is price. I was surprise that the price average is lower then $ 10 USD. The second one is the design. The nurse is also right.
Many people including me, find hospital to be a rather cold and creepy place. I always feel uncomfortable when I am in the hospital. When my mother-in-law was admitted to a private hospital for her surgery some time ago, I can't help but notice the uniforms worn by the staff at the hospital. Their attire was in lilac instead of the all-white uniform which we were familiar with. It is such a nice change to see the hospital staff in this colourful uniform. They certainly brighten up the whole hospital. When I mentioned this to a friend of mine who works as a nurse in one of the hospitals, she told me that their colourful uniforms are from ..
This online supplier specializes in a huge selection of medical supplies. http://www.qualityScrubSet.com has a wide range of nursing uniforms, scrubs, lab coats, nursing shoes, specialty uniforms, footwear, clogs and more. This leading retailer for medical and nursing scrubs has been manufacturing and distributing these uniforms for over 6 years. Their scrubs are manufactured under strict quality control and manufacturing standards. http://www.9-99ScrubSet.com's Comfort Scrubs which are made from 65% poly and 35% cotton are known for its durability and comfort in cold or warm climate. They offer a large range of colours such as the traditional blue, white, green, burgundy, grey and lilac. The great thing about these scrubs are that the colours will never fade or change no matter how times they are washed. Besides supplying these uniforms to doctors, nurses and students, CheapScrubSet.com also supplies to cosmetologists, nursing home and veterinarians. You can place your order through email or call their toll free number at 1-866-917-2782 http://www.CheapScrubSet.com accepts Paypal and major credit card such as Mastercard, American Express and Visa. For high quality discounted or cheap scrubs, medicalScrubSet.com is the ultimate choice. So hurry and check out their website now.
Posted by: james lopez | February 01, 2008 at 05:55 PM