By the Way, Sorry about Provoking the Ridiculous Constitutional Crisis
From the gobsmacked files:
WASHINGTON, Feb. 16 — Back when Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was first lady, no one better embodied what she once called the “vast right-wing conspiracy” than Richard Mellon Scaife.
Mr. Scaife, reclusive heir to the Mellon banking fortune, spent more than $2 million investigating and publicizing accusations about the supposed involvement of Mrs. Clinton and former President Bill Clinton in corrupt land deals, sexual affairs, drug running and murder.
But now, as Mrs. Clinton is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, Mr. Scaife’s checkbook is staying in his pocket.
Christopher Ruddy, who once worked full-time for Mr. Scaife investigating the Clintons and now runs a conservative online publication he co-owns with Mr. Scaife, said, “Both of us have had a rethinking.”
“Clinton wasn’t such a bad president,” Mr. Ruddy said. “In fact, he was a pretty good president in a lot of ways, and Dick feels that way today.”
Talk about your "whoopsies"...


Oh, dear. Dare we hope subsidized wingnut bloggers will no longer be getting their paychecks?
I dare, I dare!
(OT: Low and Left has closed shop this weekend - thanks for the link, though!)
Posted by: iamcoyote | February 19, 2007 at 09:04 AM
Somehow I doubt that Scaife will pull the checks from any of his trust-fund kids, like the Ma-ding-a-ling Marriage, for blaming all of Bush's faults on the Clenis tomorrow on the next day.
Posted by: Tom - 大肚腩 | February 19, 2007 at 09:37 AM
My head just fell off........can someone lend a hand?
Talk about LiberalVaporLock™
Wow!
.
Posted by: UNE_ShiftlessAndCrazy | February 19, 2007 at 09:42 AM
Interesting -- or this could be a very clumsy attempt to lull Hillary into thinking they'll hold their fire.
Posted by: Steve M. | February 19, 2007 at 09:56 AM
The article (and this post) doesn't talk about WHY she was hated. Hillary Care was that offensive? I don't think so. I think you just have a lot of little men who felt threatened by a first lady who didn't conform to the obidient wife stereotype of long ago. After all, it's not as if she ever DID anything to affect anyone's life (i.e. pass laws, write regulations, cause any fatal auto accidents, etc). She was, and still is, a target for misogynists.
Posted by: American Citizen | February 19, 2007 at 10:03 AM
Some theories:
a) Richard Mellon Scaife has decided that Hillary won't rock any of his boats or introduce anything he considers "radical" change---like real healh care reform, etc.
b) RMS is too busy funding schisms in my denomination (Episcopals) no to mention he Presbyterians and Methodists. Please remember any time you read about an Episcopal priest talking "mournfully" about having to b reak away from the American church and join the worldwide Anglican communion...........that priest is being handsomely supported by Richard Mellon Scaife. Who isn;t even Episcopalian, but sees mainline Protestamts as another front in his endless culture war.
c) he's already damaged Hillary as much as he can. Time to slime new targets----Obama, Edwards, Richardson.
Posted by: Midwest Meg | February 19, 2007 at 10:03 AM
“Clinton wasn’t such a bad president,”
Compared to what we have now? Even the wingnuts are deserting Bush.
Posted by: ronin | February 19, 2007 at 10:04 AM
Mr.Scaife must be feeling the squeeze that
Mr. Bush's policies are having on the money markets. The huge deficit and the
complete lack of any coherent monetary
policy. Mr. Scaife has a lot to loose.
Posted by: Comte de Rochambeau | February 19, 2007 at 10:07 AM
She is hated because, in their minds, she is a class traitor. Girls from the Chicago elite society are not supposed to marry boys from trailer parks in Arkansas. And that above all speaks very well of HRC. At least once in her life she did what she thought was best, and not what was expected of her.
Posted by: larry, dfh | February 19, 2007 at 10:22 AM
Seems like someone noticed the neo-cons are WORSE for the bottom line.
Posted by: mdhatter | February 19, 2007 at 10:46 AM
Just makes you want to bang your head against a wall, doesn't it?
Jayzus. The segregationists in Arkansas hated the Clintons because they weren't segregationists and because Hillary didn't change her name when she married Bill. That was enough reason why the whole world had to hear about the sex life of the President of the United States at a cost of $70m to the taxpayer.
And now they decide that Clinton wasn't such a bad president? Pay me back, you bastards.
Posted by: Avedon | February 19, 2007 at 11:17 AM
this anecdote merely tells me who the r's WANT as a democratic presidential candidate...
http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/
Posted by: profmarcus | February 19, 2007 at 11:17 AM
Lordy, these people just define contemptible, don't they? And I'm not holding my breath that he's going to make some amends for all the vituperative attacks and undermining he did to President Clinton while OUR troops were at war, either.
Posted by: Duckman GR | February 19, 2007 at 11:25 AM
"In fact, he was a pretty good president in a lot of ways," meaning: "by comparison!"
Posted by: Kyle McCullough | February 19, 2007 at 11:34 AM
Jeebus...and NToddler got a link from Atrios.
Now I know the end times are nigh.
Posted by: flory | February 19, 2007 at 12:21 PM
I still won't buy his newspaper.
Posted by: TJM | February 19, 2007 at 12:43 PM
The wingnuts don't need to fund anti-Hilary attacks, her opponents for the Democratic nomination will spend money to do that for the next year. Let's see if their pockets stay closed come mid-2008.
Posted by: PaminBB | February 19, 2007 at 12:49 PM
And we should take these guys at the word exactly ... why?
Posted by: jakester | February 19, 2007 at 12:54 PM
That was enough reason why the whole world had to hear about the sex life of the President of the United States at a cost of $70m to the taxpayer.
And now they decide that Clinton wasn't such a bad president? Pay me back, you bastards.
Word.
And THEN he can start paying us back for the Iraq war. No way in hell W. would have been elected in the first place without Scaife'd little minions sniffing through Clinton's underwear drawer.
Posted by: tikistitch | February 19, 2007 at 12:57 PM
Anybody out there really falling for this?
Just wait. If Hillary is nominated, do you think Scaife and his associates just might have another rethinking? Why waste money now, a year and a half before the election.
Posted by: Carl from L.A. | February 19, 2007 at 01:48 PM
profmarcus you are right on
Posted by: Iwonder | February 19, 2007 at 02:52 PM
Perhaps Mr. Scaife has recognized that the Bush Doctrine of imprisoning and torturing anyone what he doesn't like might just play differently in Hilary's hands. I know I'd be feeding his testicles to a rottweiler if I were preznit.
Posted by: Aaaargh | February 19, 2007 at 04:11 PM
Oh man, you just have to take a look at this...
Posted by: Atrios | February 19, 2007 at 07:07 PM
The article (and this post) doesn't talk about WHY she was hated. Hillary Care was that offensive? I don't think so. I think you just have a lot of little men who felt threatened by a first lady who didn't conform to the obidient wife stereotype of long ago. After all, it's not as if she ever DID anything to affect anyone's life (i.e. pass laws, write regulations, cause any fatal auto accidents, etc). She was, and still is, a target for misogynists.
She's was the First First Wife.
Posted by: Bas-O-Matic | February 19, 2007 at 07:07 PM
?Oh man, you just have to take a look at this...
Oh, no we don't.
Posted by: Spokane Moderate | February 19, 2007 at 08:16 PM
Oh man, you just have to take a look at this...
Gah. Being stuck in grad school forever must be its own special kind of hell.
Posted by: Thers | February 19, 2007 at 08:34 PM
Being stuck in grad school forever must be its own special kind of hell.
Yes. Yes, it is.
Posted by: Spokane Moderate | February 19, 2007 at 10:25 PM
Maybe the ghost of Anna Nicole spoke to him from Gold Digger Heaven?
Posted by: Monroe | February 19, 2007 at 10:42 PM
There's a perfectly LOGICAL explanation for this, but I doubt any of you would buy it. But it makes more sense than anything else I've read that tries to justify this obvious political theater.
Posted by: D. Douglas | February 20, 2007 at 05:01 PM
Now the right-wing maggots, Ruddy and Scaife are saying that Clinton was a pretty good president, after doing everything they could to drive Clinton out of office with their conpiratorial "Arkansas Project." Obviously, these two freaks are graduates of the CIA's school of disinformation.
Posted by: Mary Tracy | February 20, 2007 at 07:27 PM
"Obviously, these two freaks are graduates of the CIA's school of disinformation."
==========================
You're very close, Mary. : )
It just has a lot more to do with political theater. All of Bill's "hot water" back then was misdirection.
Posted by: D. Douglas | February 21, 2007 at 07:48 AM
After all was said and done, Christopher Ruddy did have very good reason to investigate the Clinton's and he did uncover a lot of dirt on the two. As far as opinions of Bill's success as a President, those seem to be of a different matter than the Vince Foster case.
Posted by: ShelbSpeaks | May 24, 2007 at 10:03 AM
Shelb, you are a treasure. It's far too late in the game for pretending that the Clinton smears weren't just that -- smears.
Posted by: Thers | May 24, 2007 at 02:33 PM